Skylum Software announced Luminar AI with advanced Sky Replacement that add a feature for sky reflections in water. Overall, I think Photoshop gives you more flexibility and power while Luminar might be a little easier to use.īut the battle of Sky Replacement software is not over. In Luminar, it was easier to relight the foreground to match the sky with only a single slider.īoth Luminar and Photoshop have really good automated Sky Replacement features which are much easier and faster than manually replacing the sky.In Photoshop, you need to import your own skies but you can nicely organize them into folders. While both products allow you to use your own images, Luminar lets you select your own skies without importing them into the software.Content-aware tools let you move objects around while maintaining a consistent background. Photoshop creates a group of layers to give you additional power in masking and editing the sky replacement Editors Choice winner Adobe Photoshop Elements includes Guided Edits, which make special effects like motion blur or color splash (where only one color shows on an otherwise black-and-white photo) a simple step-by-step process.Photoshop did a much better job on night sky photographs.You don’t need to buy another software license. If you have an Adobe Creative Cloud subscription, you get the update for free.Allows you to scale and reposition the sky.Here are the advantages of each software: This could be taken care of with Topaz DeNoise and a layer mask but more work overall than Photoshop. With Luminar, after the replacement there was some strange noise artifacts around the wings.
0 kommentar(er)
